June 23, 2026

183: "Kids Are Intuitively Hacking AI With Their Voice, Not Their Keyboard" ft. Justin Coats

183: "Kids Are Intuitively Hacking AI With Their Voice, Not Their Keyboard" ft. Justin Coats
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconPodchaser podcast player iconCastbox podcast player iconDeezer podcast player icon
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconPodchaser podcast player iconCastbox podcast player iconDeezer podcast player icon

Erik shares how he’s running a week-one “vibe coding” summer curriculum for his 10- and 7-year-old daughters using voice-first ChatGPT. He and Justin unpack what’s working, what friction to watch for, and how to think about learning, iteration, and human responsibility as AI becomes the new interface.

🧭 Conversation Highlights

  • Erik’s kids start with voice prompts to generate images, then turn them into stories and comic panels. When they hit “out of ideas,” they switch to a question-driven loop.
  • Justin connects voice interaction to a future where typing may matter less, especially compared to the speed and friction adults experience when typing vs speaking.
  • Erik explains how he designed the curriculum to teach creativity in steps: character ideas, then world-building and story arcs, then tools like Scratch.
  • They debate “creation” and responsibility: Erik pushes that he created the curriculum using a tool, while Justin emphasizes co-creation language and the need to define responsibility clearly.

💡 Key Takeaways

  • Voice-first prompting reduced friction and boosted creative iteration for kids, without requiring typing skills as a constraint.
  • A curriculum that gives kids a narrative “vehicle” (character, world, arc) is more effective than letting them only “play” with the tool.
  • Guardrails matter: AI should support thinking, questions, and drafts, but kids still need to physically do the writing to keep the skill building.
  • Ownership and responsibility should stay human-centered until AI can be held accountable for outcomes, not just outputs.

❓ Questions That Mattered

  • What’s the right sequence for teaching kids creativity with AI tools so they don’t stall out at “what do I make?”
  • How should adults think about the shift from typing to speaking as the primary interface with AI?
  • Where do we draw the line between using AI as a thinking partner versus outsourcing the actual work (like story writing)?
  • When AI helps generate curriculum or content, what does “created by” actually mean, and who is responsible for downstream impact?

🗣️ Notable Quotes

  • “There’s no wrong answers, there’s no test. It’s just… I come up with an idea, I see it.”
  • “If you create your digital baby, you didn’t do any of those things. It has to go do those things on its own.”
  • “It really seems like creativity tends to be a function of speed.”
  • “Until I can hold the AI responsible for something it created, I’m not confident I could use the language that it created something.”

🔗 Links & Resources