June 23, 2026
183: "Kids Are Intuitively Hacking AI With Their Voice, Not Their Keyboard" ft. Justin Coats
Erik shares how he’s running a week-one “vibe coding” summer curriculum for his 10- and 7-year-old daughters using voice-first ChatGPT. He and Justin unpack what’s working, what friction to watch for, and how to think about learning, iteration, and human responsibility as AI becomes the new interface.
🧭 Conversation Highlights
- Erik’s kids start with voice prompts to generate images, then turn them into stories and comic panels. When they hit “out of ideas,” they switch to a question-driven loop.
- Justin connects voice interaction to a future where typing may matter less, especially compared to the speed and friction adults experience when typing vs speaking.
- Erik explains how he designed the curriculum to teach creativity in steps: character ideas, then world-building and story arcs, then tools like Scratch.
- They debate “creation” and responsibility: Erik pushes that he created the curriculum using a tool, while Justin emphasizes co-creation language and the need to define responsibility clearly.
💡 Key Takeaways
- Voice-first prompting reduced friction and boosted creative iteration for kids, without requiring typing skills as a constraint.
- A curriculum that gives kids a narrative “vehicle” (character, world, arc) is more effective than letting them only “play” with the tool.
- Guardrails matter: AI should support thinking, questions, and drafts, but kids still need to physically do the writing to keep the skill building.
- Ownership and responsibility should stay human-centered until AI can be held accountable for outcomes, not just outputs.
❓ Questions That Mattered
- What’s the right sequence for teaching kids creativity with AI tools so they don’t stall out at “what do I make?”
- How should adults think about the shift from typing to speaking as the primary interface with AI?
- Where do we draw the line between using AI as a thinking partner versus outsourcing the actual work (like story writing)?
- When AI helps generate curriculum or content, what does “created by” actually mean, and who is responsible for downstream impact?
🗣️ Notable Quotes
- “There’s no wrong answers, there’s no test. It’s just… I come up with an idea, I see it.”
- “If you create your digital baby, you didn’t do any of those things. It has to go do those things on its own.”
- “It really seems like creativity tends to be a function of speed.”
- “Until I can hold the AI responsible for something it created, I’m not confident I could use the language that it created something.”
🔗 Links & Resources




